[PATCH] alpha bits/mman.h vs mman-linux.h

[Richard Henderson]

Joseph mentions in the wiki that alpha isn't using <bits/mman-linux.h>.  I'd
been avoiding this because mman-linux.h isn't quite as configurable as it might
be, but here's a first cut.

Is this reasonable, with the undefs?  Ought I play more with __FOO as we
already do for __MAP_ANONYMOUS?

Since the diff is larger than the new file, and harder to read, I attach the
whole thing for review.


r~
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: mman.h
Type: text/x-chdr
Size: 2297 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20131206/a5223fbd/attachment.bin>