[PATCH] Run benchmarks for constant time instead of constant iterations

[Ondřej Bílka]

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 09:34:19PM +0530, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> On 24 April 2013 21:14, Ondřej Bílka <neleai@seznam.cz> wrote:
> > This does not happen in practice. Most of time variance is estimated
> > with sufficient precision within 100 trials. Then estimate to number of
> > iterations needed is pretty accurate.
> 
> OK, I'm looking at three patches to merge in first - the two I posted
> today and the input randomizing patch you had posted earlier.  Once
> they're in we could evaluate this as an enhancement on top of those
> changes.  All of this obviously means that we need someone other than
> you and me to review these three patches.  Does that sound OK?
> 
OK for me.

Ondra