[patch] Fix for BZ #15366 (ignore __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS, __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS)
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue Apr 16 20:47:00 GMT 2013
On 04/16/2013 05:42 PM, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:27 AM, Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Should we really apply this change retroactively to C++98 and C++03?
>
> I just checked: neither C++98, nor C++03, mention <stdint.h>,
> __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS, or __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS.
I'm just wondering if whatever reason prompted the inclusion of the C++
kludge into C99 might still apply today when compiling C++98 (or C++03)
code. Why wouldn't the rationale continue to apply?
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list