[PATCH] Fix up definitions for older G++

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 08:02:59AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 09, 2012 at 01:24:57AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > Wouldn't a disjunctive form be easier to read?  E.g.
> > #if (!defined __cplusplus && defined __GNUC__) || __GNUC_PREREQ (4,3)
> 
> Dunno.  I can make that change if others agree.

I slightly prefer the disjunctive form.
If nobody disagrees, please make that change.


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20120920/9af9e09e/attachment.sig>