[PATCH] Get rid of ASM_SIZE_DIRECTIVE (take 2)

[Carlos O'Donell]

On 9/18/2012 1:06 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> That looks fine to me, though I am having second thoughts about the exact
> choice of name.  SYMBOL_SIZE doesn't really communicate that it computes
> based on ., i.e. that the placement of the macro relative to assembly code
> following the symbol is crucial.  Good names are not coming to mind just now.

Imply that it's computed: SYMBOL_CALC_SIZE?

Imply that it's positional: SYMBOL_HERE_SIZE?

Cheers,
Carlos.
-- 
Carlos O'Donell
Mentor Graphics / CodeSourcery
carlos_odonell@mentor.com
carlos@codesourcery.com
+1 (613) 963 1026