[PATCH] ftw.h: make gcc -pedantic happy

[Dmitry V. Levin]

On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:23:11PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> The substance of the change looks OK.  But is there really any need?
> Aren't those warnings suppressed in system headers anyway?

That patch was quite old, and I no longer have a compiler that actually
issued that warning in system headers.  Let's suppose the patch is not
needed nowadays.


-- 
ldv
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20120914/191771bc/attachment.sig>