secure getenv testcase...

[David Miller]

From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 21:58:44 +0200

> On 09/03/2012 09:46 PM, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> Can we get the test to fail gracefully when the user running the test
>> lacks supplementary groups?
>>
>> This is always the case for me, and it's therefore a very annoying and
>> completely unnecessary testcase failure that's been plagueing the tree
>> for more than a month.
>>
>> It seems as if there was an intention to fix this, but the discussion
>> trailed off at the end of July.
> 
> Sorry, 2bc1387273d2123398fc12133643ea2bc02a2cd1 was supposed to
> address this.  I recall testing it locally without supplementary
> groups.
> 
> Can you provide more details about the failure?  I'm not sure where to
> start looking.

SGID failed: GID and EGID match (1000)
Unexpected exit status 512 from child process