PATCH: Use unsigned long int in __bswap_64 for __WORDSIZE == 64

Roland McGrath roland@hack.frob.com
Thu Oct 11 20:16:00 GMT 2012


> I don't think it is worth the complexity since there is a check
> for __WORDSIZE already.

I consider it less complexity than repeating a function definition.
It also will make for a simple and obvious change if we later conclude
that just using uint64_t directly is an OK thing to do.


Thanks,
Roland



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list