[PATCH] Missing -fexception CFLAGS

[H.J. Lu]

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Joseph S. Myers
<joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Marcus Shawcroft wrote:
>
>> I'd appreciate feedback on the sanity of this solution.
>
> It seems fine to me (with the ChangeLog entries fixed as noted) - does
> anyone else have any comments?
>

There is no problem on i386 and x86-64 with GCC 4.7 since
async unwind table is on by default.  Does  -fexception introduce
extra bytes on i386 and x86-64?  If yes, we should use
-fasynchronous-unwind-tables, at least for i386 and x86-64.


-- 
H.J.