foo.s

Carlos O'Donell carlos@systemhalted.org
Sat May 19 12:25:00 GMT 2012


On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 12:38 AM, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> wrote:
>
> It looks like only Alpha and HPPA have foo.s files any longer.
>
> I did a quick scan over them in the glibc-ports tree and I see no
> reason why changing them all over to foo.S would break things.
>
> Could someone do that?
>
> Then I could commit the change to remove support for *.s files and
> thus the overhead of the resulting sysdep prefix rules.

I'll check this in for hppa in ~3 hours.

Cheers,
Carlos.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list