foo.s

David Miller davem@davemloft.net
Sat May 19 04:44:00 GMT 2012


It looks like only Alpha and HPPA have foo.s files any longer.

I did a quick scan over them in the glibc-ports tree and I see no
reason why changing them all over to foo.S would break things.

Could someone do that?

Then I could commit the change to remove support for *.s files and
thus the overhead of the resulting sysdep prefix rules.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list