[PATCH] Fix INSTALL description for modified files in source dir

Carlos O'Donell carlos@systemhalted.org
Fri May 18 17:32:00 GMT 2012


On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> Please note that even though you're building in a separate build
>>>> directory, the compilation may need to create or modify files and
>>>> directories in the source directory, including creating the directory
>>>> @file{autom4te.cache} or creating @file{.mo} files in the @file{po}
>>>> directory.
>>>
>>> I'd suggest zapping everything starting at ", including", and filing
>>> bugzilla bug reports for the other issues, assuming glibc aims at
>>> being able to be built from a read-only src tree.
>>
>> The manual should represent reality. I agree that we should file bug
>> reports, but that's orthogonal to the issue of documentation being
>> accurate. Do you agree?
>
> I agree, though mentioning the autom4te.cache directory doesn't sound useful
> for the target audience this documented is aims at.  IIUC from the
> irc discussion, it's a side product of an autoconf check for working
> autoconf.  Knowing where the .mo files end up sounds useful though.

Who do you consider the intended audience of the document?

Cheers,
Carlos.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list