[PATCH v2] tests: move -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE to CPPFLAGS
Mike Frysinger
vapier@gentoo.org
Mon May 14 05:09:00 GMT 2012
On Tuesday 08 May 2012 13:23:33 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tuesday 08 May 2012 09:28:15 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 1:55 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > +# Need to make sure the settings here override what configure might
> >> > +# have set up for us, so keep the CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS split logical.
> >>
> >> It doesn't say why we put the -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=1 in CPPFLAGS?
> >
> > the "keep the ... split logical" implies why -- -D/-I/etc... flags are
> > CPPFLAGS, not CFLAGS. this isn't unique to glibc.
> >
> >> # Need to make sure the settings here override what configure might
> >> # have set up for us, so use CPPFLAGS (last in the expanded list)
> >> # to set test flags we always want enabled.
> >
> > that makes it sound like we should be using CPPFLAGS for everything we
> > want to override
>
> That's not far from the truth though? :-)
>
> Any suggestion for improving it?
# Need to make sure the settings here override what configure might have
# set up for us, so keep the CFLAGS/CPPFLAGS split logical as the order is:
# <user CFLAGS> <test CFLAGS> <user CPPFLAGS> <test CPPFLAGS>
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20120514/93a26e2b/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list