One NEWS file to rule them all.

[Roland McGrath]

> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:
> > I think that's fine iff the release manager is responsible for ports too.
> 
> I'd like that to be true, but that's an assumption I'd just made in my
> head and didn't vocalize well.
> 
> Comments?

I think it would be a fine thing.  It does imply an obligation of
timeliness on the ports maintainers that was not really there before.
But I don't think that's going to be a problem.  It just needs to be
clarified in all the release wiki stuff and so forth.


Thanks,
Roland