[PATCH] Mirror i386 change on sparc: 'Avoid "anonymous" code in pthread_spin_lock'

Paul Pluzhnikov ppluzhnikov@google.com
Thu May 3 13:12:00 GMT 2012


On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 7:46 PM, Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> wrote:

> Wouldn't you get the same result as the assembly code just by removing the
> .subsection and .previous directives?  In that case the code would all be
> under the C function label, which is the point of the change.

FWIW, I tried that approach with i386,x86_64 code.

The result with .subsection removed was:

  0:   f0 ff 0f                lock decl (%rdi)
  3:   75 0b                   jne    10 <pthread_spin_lock+0x10>

 10:   f3 90                   pause
 12:   83 3f 00                cmpl   $0x0,(%rdi)
 15:   7f e9                   jg     0 <pthread_spin_lock>
 17:   eb f7                   jmp    10 <pthread_spin_lock+0x10>
 19:   31 c0                   xor    %eax,%eax
 1b:   c3                      retq

If I am reading this correctly, this will spin forever.

-- 
Paul Pluzhnikov



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list