Linux Foundation Collaboration Summit: The future of The GNU C Library.

[Jeff Law]

On 03/28/2012 01:06 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> There is one point in favor of DejaGnu: all the other GNU toolchain
> components are using it, thus a bunch of infrastructure and know-how
> already exists (see Siddhesh's offer).  Open question (and I'm
> undecided): is that argument enough to in fact *prefer* DejaGnu over
> something else?
Most of the know-how has moved on to other interests.  Folks are 
comfortable adding tests to the existing harness, but there are very few 
people that actually have knowledge of the harness itself.

Jeff