PATCH: Add x32 support to dynamic linker audit

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:35 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com> wrote:
> %lx is wrong for uint64_t, which may be long long, not
> long.

Yes, that was a typo I should have printed %llx.

So was %tu and ptrdiff_t chosen because they conveniently match the
type to be printed no matter the architecture?

Even though the meaning of ptrdiff_t isn't really what we intend here?

Cheers,
Carlos.