struct siginfo vs. siginfo_t

[Thomas Schwinge]

Hi!

On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 13:30:22 -0400, Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk> wrote:
> > On 15 Mar 2012, Thomas Schwinge said:
> >
> >>                                                        I wonder -- if GCC
> >> breaks, how much software out in the wild is going to break once this
> >> glibc change ripples through?
> >
> > A bit of quick grepping through a biggish heap of source trees
> > (including KDE 3 and 4 and GNOME 2, but not GNOME 3) suggests only GDB
> > and strace (on Tile only, so perhaps irrelevant) are likely to be broken
> > by this.

Yeah, I had already noticed GDB as the toolchain build progressed.


> Would you like to be our ambassador and give the gdb lists a heads up
> about this issue?

No worries, I'm already testing patches, and will handle it.  Evidently,
there is no need for any rush.


Grüße,
 Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20120315/9b15b9dc/attachment.sig>