On Fri, 2 Mar 2012, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> I suggest to add a comment before k=k+n stating why it's not done earlier in
> the code so that the next person might not accidentally "optimize" it.
Committed with the comment:
/* Now k and n are bounded we know that k = k+n does not
overflow. */
--
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com