[patch] Fix linking ldconfig when --enable-static-nss (with ChangeLog)

[Joseph S. Myers]

On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Paul Pluzhnikov wrote:

> The patch is much simpler than the one attached to
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6528, but requires that
> a statically-linked binary explicitly list "-lnss_files -lnss_dns
> -lresolv" on the link line.
> 
> I *think* Daniel's patch from PR 6528 would not require clients to do
> that, so perhaps that's better?

As I see it, Daniel's patch has the twin advantages:

* It reduces the amount of code involved in supporting 
--enable-static-nss.

* It makes --enable-static-nss easier to use.

Thus, I'd prefer Daniel's patch.  What do other people think?

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com