Async-signal-safe access to __thread variables from dlopen()ed libraries?
Paul Pluzhnikov
ppluzhnikov@google.com
Wed Jun 13 19:53:00 GMT 2012
On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 11:18 AM, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> wrote:
> I don't see why a linker change is necessary. The only reason we do so
> now is to enable linker relaxation. It doesn't seem like the situations
> in which this new builtin would be useful would be conducive to relaxation.
Yes, I think you are right.
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list