v2: The GNU C Library 2.16 release plan
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@systemhalted.org
Sat Jun 2 02:35:00 GMT 2012
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> On Thursday 31 May 2012 14:48:52 Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> Oh, and one other point about release testing:
>>
>> GCC routinely gets tested before release by full GNU/Linux distribution
>> rebuilds - is anyone able to test distribution rebuilds with new glibc
>> after we freeze for 4.6? This may be less likely to show up problems than
>> rebuilds with new GCC are, but it could still be useful.
>
> in testing glibc-2.16 and building up a new chroot, i've noticed two issues:
>
> - a lot of gnulib packages fail with gets() errors ... the gnulib project has
> fixed this, but it'll take a while for that to trickle down into all the
> respective projects. i've just added patches like this to fix it:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/app-arch/gzip/files/gzip-1.4-no-gets.patch
>
> - the fortify warning change wrt optimization is too noisy. i glanced
> through gcc to see if the fortify-by-default could be made to work in a
> different way, but couldn't see a clean way of doing it. instead, i'll just
> carry this in Gentoo:
Mike,
Thanks for trying everything out!
Is there any way we can come to better consensus around the fortify warnings?
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list