[PATCH] Declare set*id with warn_unused_result
Florian Weimer
fweimer@redhat.com
Tue Jul 24 15:55:00 GMT 2012
On 07/24/2012 05:50 PM, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 07/24/2012 08:37 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> The Hurd implementation allocates a new port, so it can fail as well.
>
> That's too bad. It certainly strengthens the argument for
> adding __wur.
>
> Is a new port added even for seteuid? That is, would it make
> sense to add __wur for some of these system calls, but not others?
It seems so. The wrappers in sysdeps/mach/hurd/setuid.c and
sysdeps/mach/hurd/seteuid.c end up in the same kernel call, and that
doesn't have a shortcut for shuffling the UIDs around.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list