[PATCH] Use __unused0 instead of __unused for user visible struct members
Carlos O'Donell
carlos@systemhalted.org
Mon Jan 9 03:19:00 GMT 2012
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Ulrich Drepper <drepper@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ehm, no. All symbols starting with _ belong to the system. I'm not
> going to make any change to enable broken software. Just fix that
> broken code.
Isn't *most* user code non-coforming in some way?
There is definitely a slippery slope here, but in this
case the change is purely mechanical and enables
the building of additional user code with glibc.
What technical or non-technical reasons are there for
*not* making the change?
Cheers,
Carlos.
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list