Avoid local PLT for dirfd

Marek Polacek polacek@redhat.com
Tue Feb 28 16:05:00 GMT 2012


On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 07:25:44AM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Is dirfd in POSIX?  If it isn't, then __dirfd is right (since glob is in
> POSIX).  If it is, then just libc_hidden_proto is right.

I have POSIX.1-2008 and dirfd is there.

	Marek



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list