Arch maintainers: new approach for crti.o and crtn.o

[David Miller]

From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 12:09:53 -0800 (PST)

> It sounds to me like we should just be building crt[in].os instead,
> so they get all the normal machinery for PIC-compatible objects.
> Would that work?

Absolutely it shoudl work

Are you then going to do something with symlinks or similar to end up
with the crt{n,i}.o names in the end?