[PATCH] Use __unused0 instead of __unused for user visible struct members

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Joseph S. Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> This is probably my last mail on this issue, as it does not seem to be
>> going anywhere. Thanks Carlos for your perseverance, though!
>
> Actually, I think a rough consensus was reached: establish a convention
> __glibc_reservedN for padding fields and rename them all.  See
> <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-02/msg00051.html> and followups.

Joseph,

I agree, I think using __glibc_ prefix is the best way to avoid
overlap of the identifiers.

Guillem,

Do you have time to publish another patch using the __glibc_ prefix?

Cheers,
Carlos.