-fno-inline-functions vs glibc's initfini

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Jan 31, 2012, Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com> wrote:

> I think we can do that right away without trouble, and get it onto
> release branches too.

*nod*

Want me to prepare a s/-fno-inline-functions/-fno-inline/ patch?

> On the libc side more generally, I've become skeptical that the generic C
> version of initfini is worth continuing with.

Maybe rather than using the generic version, we should have a Makefile
rule that generates the machine-dependent .s files for developers'
perusal in creating the machine-specific asm sources.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva, freedom fighter    http://FSFLA.org/~lxoliva/
You must be the change you wish to see in the world. -- Gandhi
Be Free! -- http://FSFLA.org/   FSF Latin America board member
Free Software Evangelist      Red Hat Brazil Compiler Engineer