PATH Optimized with SSE2 sinf and cof for x86_32

[Dmitrieva Liubov]

>> Please remove the Contributed line, we're not adding this anymore.

Done and reattached. Please review, I'm going to submit SSE sincos for
x86_64 after this patch merge.

--
Liubov Dmitrieva

2012/8/13 Dmitrieva Liubov <liubov.dmitrieva@gmail.com>:
>>> Did I miss something?
>
> Yes, I answered that comment in Bugzilla:
>
> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14283
>
> The bug was fixed.
>
> Today I've fixed some syntax issues in my x86_32 sinf/cosf patch:
>
>>>   *ASM_TYPE_DIRECTIVE{,_PREFIX} was removed a few days ago (commit
>>>   b67e9372b28ef33). Please use ".type L(FOO),@object" instead.
>
>>>   * Instead of defining EDOM, I suggest to:
>>>   #include <bits/errno.h>
>
>>>   * For your comments, follow the usual style - with two spaces after "."
>>>   or "?" - and no space before
>
> and I reattached it.
>
> Change log hasn't changed:
>
> 2012-08-13  Liubov Dmitrieva  <liubov.dmitrieva@gmail.com>
>
>         * sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu/multiarch/Makefile: Update
>         (sysdep_routines): Add s_sinf-sse2, s_conf-sse2
>
>         * sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu/multiarch/s_sinf-sse2.S New file
>         * sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu/multiarch/s_cosf-sse2.S New file
>         * sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu/multiarch/s_sinf.c New file
>         * sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu/multiarch/s_cosf.c New file
>         * sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32/s_sinf.c Update
>         (SINF): Add macro for using routine as __sinf_ia32
>         * sysdeps/ieee754/flt-32/s_cosf.c Update
>         (COSF): Add macro for using routine as __cosf_ia32
>
>         * sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu/multiarch/e_expf-sse2.S Fix Copyright
>         * sysdeps/i386/i686/fpu/multiarch/e_expf.c Fix Copyright
>
>
>
> --
> Liubov Dmitrieva
> Intel Corporation
>
> 2012/8/10 Carlos O'Donell <carlos@systemhalted.org>:
>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 4:13 AM, Dmitrieva Liubov
>> <liubov.dmitrieva@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Repost of the patch with optimized Sinf and Cosf for x86_32.
>>> We are looking forward to accepting and releasing this.
>>>
>>> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00624.html
>>
>> I'm confused here.
>>
>> You didn't appear to answer any of Joseph's comments from June 22nd?
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2012-06/msg00651.html
>>
>> Did I miss something?
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Carlos.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: sinf_cosf_x86_32.patch
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 40222 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20120815/70c54139/attachment.obj>