PLT refs dependent upon gcc version...

[David Miller]

From: Roland McGrath <roland@hack.frob.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:03:58 -0700 (PDT)

> I've committed the following.  Each arch maintainer with a localplt-*.data
> file should change them to use ? on the lines for PLT calls such as the
> compiler-generated outcalls, which are acceptable but not mandatory.  The
> data files can have # comment lines now, so you can say something pithy
> about why your machine has extra PLT entries that it really shouldn't
> have.  (GCC could use a switch to treat generated libgcc calls like
> attribute_hidden calls so we could get rid of these PLT entries.)

Thanks a lot Roland, I'll take a look at this.