Release timelines: 2.15.1 and 2.16
Jeff Law
law@redhat.com
Fri Apr 13 19:49:00 GMT 2012
On 04/13/2012 01:36 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> In the past Fedora was following git head and testing it heavily - and
> thus make a release for Fedora was a win-win for both Fedora and glibc.
> I think Fedora is not doing this anymore, so we're not bound here anymore.
Not exactly :( Merges were going from upstream GIT into the Fedora beta
trees, which caused *major* headaches. At the same time merges from GIT
to Fedora Rawhide were not occurring. It was the worst of both worlds.
In the new world order (F17 and beyond), we're going to be locking down
glibc from major changes earlier in the development cycle. It's not
formalized, but I'd expect to stop doing major glibc changes for any
particular Fedora release once that release branches.
Merges from upstream GIT to Fedora Rawhide should occur more rapidly
than they are right now. It's a known problem, but hasn't bubbled up
far enough yet.
Jeff
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list