Release timelines: 2.15.1 and 2.16

Jeff Law law@redhat.com
Fri Apr 13 19:49:00 GMT 2012


On 04/13/2012 01:36 PM, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
>
> In the past Fedora was following git head and testing it heavily - and
> thus make a release for Fedora was a win-win for both Fedora and glibc.
> I think Fedora is not doing this anymore, so we're not bound here anymore.
Not exactly :(  Merges were going from upstream GIT into the Fedora beta 
trees, which caused *major* headaches.  At the same time merges from GIT 
to Fedora Rawhide were not occurring.  It was the worst of both worlds.

In the new world order (F17 and beyond), we're going to be locking down 
glibc from major changes earlier in the development cycle.  It's not 
formalized, but I'd expect to stop doing major glibc changes for any 
particular Fedora release once that release branches.

Merges from upstream GIT to Fedora Rawhide should occur more rapidly 
than they are right now.  It's a known problem, but hasn't bubbled up 
far enough yet.


Jeff



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list