[PATCH] memset: fix define usage for shared libs

Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
Thu Apr 5 16:11:00 GMT 2012


On Thursday 05 April 2012 02:29:27 Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > The proper define to check "am I in a shared lib" is "SHARED", not "PIC".
> > The two new memset_chk functions incorrectly depend on "PIC".
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
> > 
> > 2011-02-22  Mike Frysinger  <vapier@gentoo.org>
> > 
> >        * sysdeps/i386/i686/memset_chk.S: Change PIC to SHARED.
> >        * sysdeps/x86_64/memset_chk.S: Likewise.
> 
> Please check this in.

i don't recall being granted access to glibc git repo ... i'm in the 
sourceware.org cvs tree ...

> However, please re-read Ulrich's comments. His original complaint is valid.

i don't know what you mean.  i pointed out that "SHARED" and "PIC" have 
different meanings, and this code was utilizing the wrong one.

> Tell us about your users, and your use case, and why something which
> *normally* works (even if it's not correct), no longer works.
> 
> That way we can *own* your problem and in the future when writing code
> we'll remember why we need to be precise about PIC vs. SHARED.

in the original posting, i was omitting "we build static objects for PIE usage 
which implies PIC" because Ulrich specifically rejected any patches that fixed 
that use case.

in the repost, i could have included more details since we appear to be on a 
sane path now.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20120405/9d0ca37d/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list