iconvdata regression

[Carlos O'Donell]

On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Andreas Jaeger <aj@suse.com> wrote:
>> Do we agree that build breakage is *much* more serious since it
>> impacts reg testing?
>
> Yes, I do.
>
> IMO giving a grace period for fixing broken stuff is fine and we should
> record what the grace period is - dependend on whether it's a build failure
> or a testsuite one. If somebody is actively working on it promptly, I would
> not revert for a testsuite failure. I'm also fine with reverting patches.
>
> Btw. I commited for Tulin and did not test all of glibc directly (just run
> the testsuite for wcsmbs) and commented that it's broken as well in the
> thread.
>
> I can revert the patch if the testsuite fix takes longer,

Thanks for your input Andreas.

I'm fine giving upwards of a week to fix a testsuite failure.

I want 24h revert of unacknowledged build breakage, or at most 48h
revert of acknowledged build breakage.

Does anyone think this is fair?

What does GCC do here?

Cheers,
Carlos.