[PATCH v2 0/10] Tilera (and Linux asm-generic) support for glibc
Chris Metcalf
cmetcalf@tilera.com
Thu Nov 10 15:35:00 GMT 2011
(Resending as text/plain.)
On 11/9/2011 11:14 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if you send out another patchset, could you fix the summaries of your patches.
> having them all be the same makes it hard to pick through quickly.
Do you mean the Subject lines all being the same in the emails that make up
each patch set? I almost gave them all different subject lines to match
the contents, but at the last minute "saved" myself by reading in the
sourceware glibc "Contribution checklist" wiki
(http://sourceware.org/glibc/wiki/Contribution%20checklist):
[...]
For Multi-part patch set contributions where [PATCH 0/2] is used to
described the forth coming patches:
*
[PATCH 0/2] <Subject>
*
[PATCH 1/2] <Same subject as for 0/2>
*
[PATCH 2/2] <Same subject as for 0/2>
I figured the moderation software might eat my patches otherwise. Oh well! :-)
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list