libc-nonshared dependency

Ulrich Drepper drepper@gmail.com
Tue May 10 19:09:00 GMT 2011


On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 03:10, Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> ok?

No, why?  This would just be hiding symptoms of problems with the arm
ABI.  You need to find a more generic solution in the arm
configuration or add the rules into the arm makefiles.  In any case
would a solution live in the arm tree.  I'm not polluting the tree for
the sake of an arch like that since then there would only be more of
these types of hacks.



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list