[PATCH] respect build CPPFLAGS

Mike Frysinger vapier@gentoo.org
Sat Dec 17 21:41:00 GMT 2011


On Saturday 17 December 2011 13:59:03 Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 13:17, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > for a little background, some distros (like Debian, Ubuntu, Gentoo, and
> > i'm sure others) enable _FORTIFY_SOURCE by default in their compilers.
> >  the way to disable this is by using -U_FORTIFY_SOURCE:
>
> This is no solution since you have no control over the place where the
> parameter is used relative to whatever you try to disable.

i really have no idea what you're trying to say

> Complicating the makefile handling even more without any
> real benefit doesn't really sound right.

it's making the flag handling in the build system consistent, and we're talking 
all of 1 line and 1 additional variable expansion.  "complicating" is kind of 
stretching the definition ...
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20111217/7792cb61/attachment.sig>


More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list