[Libtirpc-devel] Fwd: Re: proposed patch to rpcbind to provide finer-grained security controls than offered by the -i option

[Thomas Schwinge]

Hallo!

On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 10:45:55PM -0500, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 17:52, Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com> wrote:
> > This sounds very reasonable... What is the next step?
> 
> First, the Hurd people have to say what they want to do.  If they go
> along then no specialization is needed.

To clarify: did you have anything specific in mind?  I don't know why we
would want to diverge?  (There is nothing Hurd or Mach-specific in the
SUN RPC code, unless I'm totally confused?)


Grüße,
 Thomas
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20101214/ddf37d77/attachment.sig>