Proposal for STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_*_IRELATIVE

Ulrich Drepper drepper@redhat.com
Tue May 26 17:45:00 GMT 2009


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rod Evans wrote:
> Late last year there was a discussion in regards STT_IFUNC, and we
> thought you'd settled on this name (no _GNU_) and the associated
> value of 7.

No.  Because _you_ said you don't want this we settled on an OS-specific
value and name.


> I assume we should now remove this dead-wood and reserve the STT_LOOS
> value instead.

Why reserve it?  It's OS-specific.  Nobody will crowd that range but you
and if you should use it and it's a different value, then it doesn't
matter either.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkocKdwACgkQ2ijCOnn/RHRRWwCfbSofNRTx5qCs4fm+LC6xUQvQ
LFIAoKFxCU72dVRRV1TqH+86lyKKknDK
=MtoW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list