linux:sys_ipc syscall
Mike Frysinger
vapier@gentoo.org
Thu May 7 00:31:00 GMT 2009
On Wednesday 06 May 2009 20:13:16 KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > I would like to ask you if someone from you work on separate ipc
> > syscalls. I mean that all code call one sys_ipc syscall not separate
> > syscall like sys_semctl, sys_semget, sys_semop, sys_msgctl,
> > sys_msgget, sys_msgrcv, sys_msgsnd, sys_shmat, sys_shmctl, sys_shmdt,
> > sys_shmget.
> >
> > I look at http://repo.or.cz/w/glibc.git and I haven't seen it there.
>
> May I ask the benfit of this change?
> In general, unnecessally ABI change cause very large end-user confusion.
the ABI change is between C library and kernel. there is no end-user
difference.
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20090507/1967e482/attachment.sig>
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list