Fix ____longjmp_chk for ppc(64)
Andreas Schwab
aschwab@redhat.com
Wed Jun 24 16:48:00 GMT 2009
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net> writes:
> Ah. Then perhaps a trap insn might be more
> appropriate (and slightly less confusing)?
How about this?
bl HIDDEN_JUMPTARGET (__fortify_fail); \
+ /* __fortify_fail doesn't return, but we need \
+ an insn to attach the cfi to it. */ \
+ nop; \
+ cfi_adjust_cfa_offset (-112); \
+ cfi_same_value (lr); \
.Lok:
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, aschwab@redhat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list