[discuss] Proposal for STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_*_IRELATIVE

[H.J. Lu]

On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 6:30 AM, Paul Brook<paul@codesourcery.com> wrote:
>> The only other alternative to #1 that I see is some scheme whereby "&func"
>> will in all cases resolve to a PLT entry rather than the actual
>> STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol's st_value.  i.e., the ifunc resolver is only called
>> for PLT resolution (and you can do all those last for BIND_NOW).
>
> This will break pointer comparisons across modules.
>

Please try the current binutils in CVS. I think I have fixed all
problems. If not,
please open a bug report with a testcase.

Thanks.


-- 
H.J.