Proposal for STT_GNU_IFUNC and R_*_IRELATIVE

Paul Brook paul@codesourcery.com
Mon Jun 8 13:22:00 GMT 2009


> The only other alternative to #1 that I see is some scheme whereby "&func"
> will in all cases resolve to a PLT entry rather than the actual
> STT_GNU_IFUNC symbol's st_value.  i.e., the ifunc resolver is only called
> for PLT resolution (and you can do all those last for BIND_NOW).

This will break pointer comparisons across modules.

Paul



More information about the Libc-alpha mailing list