On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 13:54:12 +0530 Sripathi Kodi <sripathik@in.ibm.com> wrote: > Does Roland's patch (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/18/589) look good to go > in, provided Ulrich's comment (http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/1/19/15) is > addressed? Sure, it looks sane - it avoids the problematic get_task_by_pid() too.