nptl lock code obviously busted for SuperH

[Kaz Kojima]

Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org> wrote:
> looks like somewhere along the line between glibc-2.6 and glibc-2.7, 
> sh/lowlevellock.S and sh/lowlevelrobustlock.S got kicked in.  there's obvious 
> line continuations missing and one of the macros is missing an argument 
> (declares 2 when it should take and actually uses 3).  the attached patch 
> should fix things up.

Thanks for pointing this out.  I shouldn't miss it, though
it's for the old kernels which I don't have already.
Uli, could you please approve this patch?

Regards,
	kaz