glibc segfault on "special" long double values is _ok_!?

[Jan-Benedict Glaw]

On Thu, 2007-06-07 10:02:53 -0500, Jeremy Linton <jli@greshamstorage.com> wrote:
> 	From monitoring this mailing list for a while it appears apparent 
> 	that certain people pride themselves in rejecting any patch which improves 
> the robustness of glibc.

Is "robustness" like "not crashing loudly when used out-of-specs"? I'd
rather like to fix the bugs...

MfG, JBG

-- 
      Jan-Benedict Glaw      jbglaw@lug-owl.de              +49-172-7608481
Signature of:              Alles sollte so einfach wie möglich gemacht sein.
the second  :                          Aber nicht einfacher.  (Einstein)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/attachments/20070608/d5391b4c/attachment.sig>