[PING] Re: String Functions for x86-64

[Menezes, Evandro]

Hi, HJ. 

> We took a closer look at the new memcpy. We found that the new memcpy
> was faster than the old one for sizes 1-1024 bytes, but much slower
> than the old one for sizes > 1024 bytes. We are still investigating.

Did you observe differences slow downs in the order of 0.5% in some cases as in http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-alpha/2006-05/txt00001.txt too?

How about the other routines submitted, what did you find out about them?

Thanks,

-- 
_______________________________________________________
Evandro Menezes               AMD            Austin, TX