[RFC] [PATCH] Make lio_listio set errno to EIO on requests with invalid aio_lio_opcode
Suzuki
suzuki@In.ibm.com
Tue Feb 21 08:53:00 GMT 2006
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 12:54:09PM +0530, Suzuki wrote:
>
>>Roland McGrath wrote:
>>
>>>There is no obligation to check for this kind of error, given the standard.
>>
>>According to the standards, lio_listio should return EIO with invalid
>>opcodes.
>
>
> "According to the standards" is vague, you need to cite precisely what you base
> your assertion on.
> I don't see such requirement in
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/functions/lio_listio.html
Sorry for the vague description. I was referring to the same document.
It says :
"The aio_lio_opcode field of each aiocb structure specifies the
operation to be performed. The supported operations are LIO_READ,
LIO_WRITE, and LIO_NOP; these symbols are defined in <aio.h>. The
LIO_NOP operation causes the list entry to be ignored. "
....
"[EIO]
One or more of the individual I/O operations failed. The
application may check the error status for each aiocb structure to
determine the individual request(s) that failed."
If the opcode is not supported then that I/O operation should fail. For
those requests, since we know that I/O operation has failed, even before
enqueuing a request, shouldn't lio_listio() return EIO ?
Thanks,
Suzuki
>
> Jakub
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list