feasibility of modifying Linux ld-linux.so to identify which mapped files are shared libraries
Ray Bryant
raybry@engr.sgi.com
Thu May 12 02:44:00 GMT 2005
Ian Wienand wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 09:33:34AM -0500, Ray Bryant wrote:
>
>>Christoph Hellwig has suggested that instead we modify the dynamic loader
>>to mark mapped files in kernel memory as being shared libraries; this would
>>likely be communicated to the kernel via a new MMAP flag.
>
>
> I can see situations where this could be useful for more than just
> your immediate project.
>
> We've demonstrated using IA64 protection keys for sharing TLB entries.
> If we knew at mmap() time this was a shared library we could setup
> keys then. I think that could work out better than doing it carte
> blanche on MAP_SHARED since it might help manage the limited
> protection key registers better.
>
> It might also act as an extra hint that this is a good candidate for a
> higher order superpage than it may otherwise be allocated.
>
> Not that anyone cares what I think, but I can see how this could be
> useful.
>
> -i
> ianw@gelato.unsw.edu.au
> http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au
Hi Ian,
What kind of interface do you have in mind here? I was thinking along the
lines of using a program to set some special bits (or add a special section)
to the elf header indicating that a corresponding bit needed to be passed into
mmap/madvise when the segment was mapped into memory by the dynamic loader.
Can you fit into such a scheme or do you need a more general capability?
(It sounds as if you might want to execute an arbitrary function at ld.so
time for each ELF segment, but that goes a bit beyond the scope of what I
was thinking.)
--
Best Regards,
Ray
-----------------------------------------------
Ray Bryant
512-453-9679 (work) 512-507-7807 (cell)
raybry@sgi.com raybry@austin.rr.com
The box said: "Requires Windows 98 or better",
so I installed Linux.
-----------------------------------------------
More information about the Libc-alpha
mailing list