PATCH: Spell exp2l correctly

[Steve Munroe]

Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com> wrote on 03/28/2005 02:43:45 PM:

> Ok, since long-double-fcts is only set in a few configurations, it turns
> out to be pretty easy to tell which ones might be affected.  i.e., it's
> only those few long-double-fcts=yes platforms that had it correct.  So,
> it's straightforward to add a Versions fragment for each of those few 
and
> update the generic one used by all other configurations.  I've committed
> changes to do this.  But I have not actually done a build on any of the
> platforms on which sysdeps/generic/w_exp2.c was being used to define 
exp2l
> (or fail to).
> 

powepc64 is about be a long-double-fcts=yes platform. I believe Dwayne 
submitted the patches for the powerpc64 long double support last week. 

This of course is dependent on a general solution to versioning the two 
sizes of long double within glibc. Jakub has proposed a mechanism/patch to 
do this but I believe this is still unresolved. 

Steven J. Munroe
Linux on Power Toolchain Architect
IBM Corporation, Linux Technology Center