forestalling GNU incompatibility - proposal for binary relative dynamic linking

[Joe Buck]

On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 01:15:49PM -0800, Edward Peschko wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 09:49:47PM -0800, Dan Kegel wrote:
> > Why are you replacing the system glibc?  That's never a good idea.
> 
> I'm not replacing the system glibc - all I am doing is making the point
> that *if* you compile glibc and run it against system binaries, the 
> system binaries break.

This discussion is off-topic for the gcc list.  Whether there are problems
with glibc or the LSB is a matter for other lists, not for gcc@gcc.gnu.org.